Brief History
Mile End

From Working-Class Garment District to Playground for the Wealthy

The gentrification of Montréal's Mile End neighbourhood is a process that has been taking place for over 25 years. The borough was known for its garment industry throughout the 19th and 20th centuries, until changes in free trade regulations on the global market in the late 1980s and early 1990s led to a collapse of manufacturing in North America. During that time, it was also the site of a strong, working-class immigrant population — particularly Eastern European Jews — who settled in the area before and during the postwar period. The melting pot of Greek, Portuguese, Romanian, Polish, German and other immigrant residents helped to create the diverse and rich cultural reputation that the neighbourhood is known for.

Many of the famous garment factories where these workers toiled — and sometimes rebelled, as in the former Vineberg Building, where 4,500 workers went out on strike for 45 days in 1912 — closed down in the early- to mid-1990s. Several of these old factory buildings would later be converted into new commercial and residential housing, including the Peck building, which became the site of Ubisoft Montreal in 1997. This followed the province’s adoption in 1996 of the Québec Multimedia Tax Credit, which allows a 37.5% refundable tax credit that subsidizes staff wages at tech companies operating in the province. (Interestingly, this parallels the original establishment of the Peck suit factory, which similarly benefited from a tax credit.)

By the time of Ubisoft’s arrival, the garment industry’s collapse had caused a wide-scale disinvestment of capital in the neighbourhood. Disinvestment manifests as urban decay: property owners see no monetary incentive to perform maintenance, repairs or improvements. Buildings start to leak and crumble. The neighbourhood acquires a reputation as a “bad part of town” or even a “dump.” (Later, this decay acquires a patina that contributes to the area’s “charm” and “character,” but this takes time.)

The Peck building, now occupied by Ubisoft Montréal.

Disinvestment also means falling property values and rent prices. Property becomes cheap and ripe for renovation and subdivision. There is a gold rush as former renters become owners, pushing out poorer residents and forming a new generation of small landlords in the borough. (This, too, is a case of history repeating: former residents who moved out of the area in the 1940s formed the basis of a landlord class who would exploit new immigrant tenants for the remainder of the century.)

For a time, the area remains relatively affordable. Artists move in, lured in both by low rents and by abundant cheap workshop space in subdivided former factories. It’s at this point that the neighbourhood starts to acquire its reputation as a “trendy” arts hub. Small capitalists follow; the first new company to move into the Peck building is Discreet Logic, a scrappy young tech firm founded in 1991. (Discreet Logic was acquired by Autodesk in 1998; only later would Ubisoft grow to fill the entire building.)

Finally, city planners start to take note, kicking off reinvestment plans under the mantle of “urban renewal.” Active encouragement from the municipal, provincial, and federal governments lead to an influx of tech companies from the late 90s up to the present day. Ubisoft, Microsoft and smaller tech outfits like French aerospace company Thales are incentivized to move into the neighbourhood. With them come new boutiques, venues, condos and higher rents.

In only a few decades, the character of the neighbourhood has changed dramatically— from working-class garment district, to slum, to art and tech hub. For landlords and business owners, who both hold capital that stands to grow or appreciate from more affluent residents and shoppers, this is a welcome change. For those who have been displaced by exorbitant rents and social isolation — including many of the workers who helped build the neighborhood — this has been catastrophic. In 2018, while residents openly worried about the encroachment of tech companies leading to unaffordable rent hikes in Marconi-Alexandra, mayor of Rosemont–La Petite-Patrie François Croteau tried to have it both ways, saying:

We don’t want to be the next Silicon Valley in terms of social impact. In technological impact, of course, in economic development, of course, but not the social impact of the neighbourhood.

Incidentally, Mile End originally comprised the area north of the Van Horne underpass where the Marconi-Alexandra area is located. The coming of the railroad tracks set this area on a different trajectory — it was only later that it came to establish itself as Little Italy. The concept of “Mile Ex” as a district or neighbourhood is a much more recent construct, one entirely fabricated by developers and planners to facilitate and accelerate gentrification.

This is a good argument for thinking of the problem holistically, tracking the effects of gentrification beyond the artificial boundaries of the current-day Mile End. Consider the fact that it was Jeremy Kornbluth and Brandon Shiller (son of Stephen Shiller, of notorious predatory real estate firm Shiller Lavy) that were responsible for the rent hike that caused Le Cagibi to move to Little Italy in 2018. Kornbluth and Shiller were also responsible for a highly unpopular (and ultimately doomed) Starbucks franchise opening at their Jean-Talon Market property in 2015.

Saint-Laurent Boulevard in 1976. (Photo credit: Philippe Du Berger)

Despite whatever developers and landlords might say about a neighbourhood’s special “character,” they know full well these divisions are artificial. For their part, they always have their sights set on the next hot development zone, ready at a moment’s notice to divest in one place and reinvest in another. Consider, also, that many residents of nearby boroughs such as Rosemont-La Petite-Patrie, Little Italy, Villeray and Parc Ex are former residents who were priced out of Mile End, only to find rents steadily climbing all over the city (a February 2021 report from rentals.ca lists the yearly increase for 2-bedroom apartments at 3.1%). Likewise, renoviction rates have skyrocketed. Housing advocate Martin Blanchard told the CBC in 2019:

We used to get 50 to 100 calls per year [...] Now we get many hundreds every year. It's a crisis.

His group, the Comité logement de la Petite Patrie, conducted a study released in December 2020 that found that of 363 units retaken by landlords between 2015 and 2020 for the purposes of renoviction, 85% of those lease refusals were fraudulent.

In 2014, when the provincial government proposed a 20% cut to the multimedia tax credit, the Québec technology industry business owners’ association and lobby group Alliance Numerique published a report arguing against the cut entitled Perpetuating the Quebec Miracle,” in which they stated: “the video game industry is at the heart of the recent revitalization of two now-dynamic neighborhoods.” The report goes on to describe the public and private capital infusions into the city, including a $9.8 million “revitalization” project undertaken by the City of Montreal in 2008 to beautify the area of St. Viateur East. The same year, local paper The Metropolitain published an article by Jessica Murphy entitled Will gentrification threaten Mile End Artists? which puts the project in the context of higher rents pushing poorer artists out of the neighbourhood to make way for luxury office buildings.

With all this in mind, it’s not possible to separate the predatory landlordism of real estate firms like Shiller Lavy from a historical pattern of gentrification in Mile End which kicked off with the collapse of the garment industry. The pattern of disinvestment and reinvestment that characterizes gentrification is more complex than any single real estate firm and is inseparable from the rise of the tech industry — and from widespread housing speculation enabled by the “renoviction” phenomenon that accompanies wild fluctuations in property values. It is also not possible to separate this process from the changing social complexion of Mile End and of other neighbourhoods throughout the city. The loss of cultural institutions and public space and the dramatic rise in housing instability and houselessness (which according to some estimates has doubled since the start of the pandemic) are part and parcel of the phenomenon of gentrification.

The Consequences for
Working Artists

The Mile End boasts a vibrant art scene and is often associated with beloved boutiques, music venues, eateries, commercial galleries and bookstores, not to mention fantastic murals, public spectacles and beloved cultural icons. In many people’s minds, it is very hard to separate this scene from specific businesses such as Divan Orange, Le Cagibi, Phonopolis or S.W. Welch, and it’s hard not to feel a certain sense of betrayal when these businesses also fall victim to predatory rent hikes and fraudulent evictions. When there are fewer and fewer public arts spaces available, it’s natural that people will form attachments to the private institutions that come in to fill the void. What is less acknowledged, however, is the effect that gentrification has on those artists who are not wealthy, who do not own capital, and who can’t afford to keep living in a neighbourhood they, too, helped to build by their labour.

A more honest historical account of the role of artists in the city would situate the rise of the borough as a creative epicenter in the 1980s and early 1990s, when the garment industry was in the process of collapsing. Artists who had formerly lived in Old Montréal faced gentrification caused by new development projects there, leading to a mass exodus and resettlement in Mile End, where rents were suddenly dirt cheap. These working artists helped to create a lively center for mural artists, film-makers, musicians, writers and others. This helped to beautify the neighbourhood and, incidentally, made it more attractive for developers and city officials looking to raise property values in the area. With the advent of the tech sector and the influx of new capital that followed the founding of Ubisoft Montréal, rising rents threatened to push out poorer artists who could not buy property, just as they had years before in Old Montréal.

Postcard of John W. Peck & Co. Ltd. circa 1910. (Image credit: BAnQ Rosemont- La Petite-Patrie)

It was in 2008 that Toronto-based real estate company Allied Properties Real Estate Investment Trust purchased the Peck Building, as well as two other buildings behind it, for $30 million more than they had cost four years earlier. In response, artists determined not to be priced out of the area formed a strategic alliance with other residents, politicians, and even some local business owners to resist redevelopment. In 2012, the borough passed a zoning law to restrict the size of commercial tenants in megastructures to prevent another Ubisoft from occurring. This move ultimately failed to halt rents from rising — and neither did it stop Allied from refusing to renew these tenants’ leases, since they preferred instead to simply push them out and make way for smaller commercial tenants. Right here, we see an antagonism between the interests of residential tenants and small business owners.

Then, in 2013, the artist collective Pied Carré signed a 30-year deal with Allied promising 208,000 square feet of gallery and studio space in the de Gaspé megastructures. This move was brokered by municipal politicians and endorsed by Ubisoft. These sorts of public-private agreements, while perhaps better than nothing, hinge entirely on Ubisoft and Allied continuing their investments in the area. As far as they’re concerned, projects that beautify the area and make it attractive for business are beneficial for them too — as long as there’s still a profit to be made. But that’s irrespective of whether or not working artists and other working tenants can keep affording to live in the area. These projects have done nothing to curtail runaway speculation, rent hikes, or renovictions. The art will still be there for a wealthier, whiter, and smaller population to enjoy at commercial galleries and chic boutiques, while poorer artists struggle to get by.

Notes and Resources

Regroupement des comités logement et associations de locataires du Québec (RCLALQ)


Is your landlord harassing you or trying to evict you? RCLALQ is the Québec federation of housing committees (comités logement) and tenants’ associations (associations de locataires). These committees and associations are a great first port of call in any kind of housing crisis or legal or extralegal conflict. Check their map to find the one nearest you!

Comité logement du Plateau Mont-Royal


The comité logement for the Plateau Mont-Royal borough, which includes the neighbourhood of Mile End.

Comité logement de la Petite Patrie


The comité logement for Petite Patrie, the neighbourhood directly to the north of Mile End which includes Little Italy. They recently put out an excellent investigative report on evictions in the city which (amongst other things) remarks that 85% of evictions in Québec are fraudulent in nature. (Available in French only.)

Front d’action populaire en réaménagement urbain


A federation of organizations in Québec advocating for tenants’ rights and for social housing.

Mile End Memories / Mémoire du Mile End


A historical society and community group for Mile End. Their website is an excellent resource for discovering the history of the neighbourhood.

Download the printable PDF